RACING CARNIVAL 2026 SCHEDULING CONCERNS AND THE DILUTION OF A PREMIER RACING SHOWCASE

 

RACING CARNIVAL 2026

SCHEDULING CONCERNS AND THE DILUTION OF A PREMIER RACING SHOWCASE

 

By Mahindar Singh Rathore (Turf Tracker)

 

The Indian Racing Carnival scheduled for Sunday, 15th March 2026 at Mahalaxmi Racecourse is intended to represent one of the most prestigious afternoons in the Indian racing calendar. Backed by the Poonawalla interests and featuring the elite Fillies’ and Colts’ races sponsored by the Shapoorji Mistry banner, the Carnival has historically been positioned as a celebration of the highest standards of Indian thoroughbred sport.

Yet, the present year’s planning raises fundamental concerns about strategic race programming and its consequences on field strength, sporting quality, and public engagement.

A double-header race weekend has been scheduled on 7th and 8th March 2026 — merely a week prior to the Carnival. From a racing perspective, this decision is difficult to justify. Horses competing during a demanding two-day meeting are rarely turned out again within such a short interval, particularly in top-class company. Trainers and owners, mindful of recovery cycles and peak performance windows, inevitably reserve their best stock. The predictable outcome is thinner and less competitive fields in the very races meant to define the Carnival.

Premier race days derive their prestige not from branding or sponsorship alone, but from the depth and quality of participation. When scheduling decisions inadvertently fragment the available horse population, the sporting core of the event is compromised. For spectators and punters alike, reduced competitiveness diminishes both spectacle and wagering interest — the two pillars sustaining racing attendance.

The wider context further amplifies this concern. The Indian Derby Day held on 1st February 2026 also witnessed attendance levels below historic norms. While numerous peripheral attractions were promoted — hospitality, entertainment, and lifestyle experiences — there appeared limited emphasis on communicating the sporting narrative itself: the horses, their rivalries, preparation, pedigree, and performance. Racing’s emotional appeal lies in the equine athlete; when promotion shifts toward ancillary experiences, the sport risks losing its central identity.

Indian racing today faces a perceptible erosion of public engagement. In such an environment, flagship events like the Indian Racing Carnival must be curated with meticulous sporting logic. Programming should consolidate, not disperse, elite participation. The objective should be to assemble the strongest possible fields on the Carnival day, thereby reinforcing its status as a true championship showcase.

An underlying structural issue may also be observed. Many administrative and strategic decisions within racing institutions are guided by highly accomplished industrial and corporate leadership. Their managerial success in business innovation is unquestionable. However, the dynamics of a heritage sport governed by biological athletes, training cycles, handicap structures, and competitive balance require specialised racing insight. Without adequate domain-centric input, well-intentioned initiatives can inadvertently weaken sporting outcomes.

At present, Indian racing appears to lack a sufficiently assertive internal mechanism willing to question scheduling decisions that undermine marquee events. The consequence is not merely an isolated planning anomaly, but a gradual dilution of flagship race days that once defined the sport’s public stature.

If the Indian Racing Carnival is to retain — and reclaim — its position as a premier national racing showcase, three fundamentals must guide future planning:

Scheduling integrity that protects field strength

Sport-centric promotion highlighting equine excellence

Racing-domain decision input in institutional planning

 

The Carnival should represent the pinnacle of Indian turf competition. Its success depends not on peripheral spectacle, but on the concentration of the nation’s best thoroughbreds in genuine championship contest.

Indian racing cannot afford to weaken its own crown jewels through avoidable programming fragmentation. The long-term credibility of its showcase events depends on recognising — and correcting — such structural missteps.

“NO YOUTH, NO FUTURE: WHY INDIAN HORSE RACING MUST CHANGE NOW”

 

“No Youth, No Future: Why Indian Horse Racing Must Change Now”

By TURF TRACKER (Mahindar Singh Rathore)

1️⃣  Make Racecourses a “Day Out”, Not Just a Betting Pit

Younger Indians don’t come only to gamble. They come for vibe + shareability.

What can be done (low to medium cost):

• Music zones (DJ between races, live indie bands on feature days)
• Food truck festivals instead of old club canteens
  (burgers, momos, chaat, biryani bowls, craft mocktails)
• Casual seating: bean bags, lawn seating, picnic zones
• Designated “Friends & First-Timers” enclosures

👉 Pune & Bangalore are perfect test beds for this.

---

2️⃣  Kill the “Elite & Intimidating” Image

Right now, a racecourse feels like:

“If you don’t know someone, you don’t belong.”

Fixes:

• Free or ₹100 entry for students (with ID)
• “First Race Free Bet” coupons (₹100–₹200 value)
• Casual dress code zones (no jackets, no ties nonsense)
• Friendly volunteers: “Ask Me About Racing”

You don’t grow a sport by scolding newcomers.

---

3️⃣  Make Betting Simple, Transparent & Digital-First

Youngsters hate:
❌ Complicated terminology
❌ Manual tote windows
❌ Feeling lost

India-specific solutions:

• Beginner betting menus:
• “Pick the Winner”
• “Top 3 Finish”
• “Beat the Favourite”
• QR-code based “How to Bet in 60 Seconds” videos
• UPI-only express counters for under-35s
• Micro bets: ₹50–₹100 minimums

👉 Betting should feel like fantasy sports, not a maths exam.

---

4️⃣  Content is King: Racing Must Live on the Phone 📱

If it’s not on Instagram/Reels/YouTube, it doesn’t exist.

What works with Indian youth:

• Short reels:
• “Horse of the Day”
• “Jockey to Watch”
• “Upset Alert”
• Behind-the-scenes:
• Morning trackwork
• Saddling paddock moments
• Jockey interviews in Hinglish
• Meme culture (yes, really)

You already know this space well, Turf Tracker—independent voices build trust faster than clubs.

---

5️⃣  Create New Heroes (Not Just Owners & Trainers)

Young fans follow faces, not pedigrees.

Push:

• Jockey rivalries
• Underdog trainers
• “From stable lad to winner” stories
• Feature one jockey per race day on screens & social media

Give them characters, not just results.

---

6️⃣ Blend Racing with Youth Culture

Racing must collide with things youth already love.

Collaborations:

• College festivals (race-day passes as prizes)
• Stand-up comics & influencers hosting race days
• Esports / fantasy sports cross-promotions
• Fashion pop-ups on Derby & Oaks days

Make racing cool by association.

---

7️⃣  Fix the Viewing Experience (Cheap, Big Impact)

Indian racecourses are visually underused.

Easy wins:

• Big LED screens with:
• Speed ratings
• Silks explained
• “Why this horse can win”
• Clear race replays within 2 minutes
• Commentary that explains, not just announces

Racing must teach while entertaining.

---

8️⃣  Position Racing as Skill, Not Gambling

Parents fear gambling. Youth want strategy.

Reframe it as:

• Data analysis
• Probability
• Form reading
• Decision-making under uncertainty

Workshops:

• “How to read a race card”
• “Why favourites lose”
• “Handicapping 101”

This is where your analytical expertise fits perfectly.

---

9️⃣  Special “Youth Days” (Once a Month)

Instead of changing every day, start small:

• Youth-only enclosures
• Music + food + racing bundle
• Influencer hosts
• Reduced betting minimums

Test → refine → expand.

---

🔟 What Will NOT Work in India (Hard Truths)

❌ Copying UK club culture blindly
❌ Over-regulation of fun
❌ Treating youth as “problem gamblers”
❌ Ignoring regional languages
❌ Expecting loyalty without engagement

---

Final Thought (Straight Talk)

Indian racing doesn’t have a money problem.
It has a relevance problem.

The younger crowd will come if racing stops talking at them and starts talking with them.

 

REMEMBERING AN UNSUNG HERO - TRAINER NARAYAN SINGH

 

NARAYAN SINGH —   A LIFE ON THE INDIAN TURF

---

Early Years — From Jockey to Trainer (Pre-1956)

Narayan Singh’s horse racing journey began in the saddle. Starting as a jockey riding for M. C. Patel, he developed a deep, instinctive understanding of Thoroughbreds under race pressure and the delicate balance between speed and stamina — lessons that later formed the core of his training philosophy. He rode in Rajkot and Delhi, gaining practical knowledge that would serve him well in years to come.

Returning to Bombay in the mid-1950s, he made the decisive transition from rider to trainer — a move that would define his life’s work in Indian racing.

---

Taking Out a License — Idar Stable (1956)

In April 1956, Narayan Singh took out his trainer’s license as the private trainer to the princely stable of Idar. His first runner under the new license, His Lordship, delivered a commanding four-length victory — a telling start that announced his potential as a trainer with both patience and skill.

---

First Major Success — Fair Wood’s Origins (Late 1950s)

In the late 1950s, Narayan Singh was responsible for the early conditioning and development of the colt Vandyke, who later won the Indian Derby as Fair Wood — underscoring his ability to line up young talent for great success.

---

Historic Classic Success — Rose de Bahama (1959-60)

The winter season of 1959-60 remains one of Narayan Singh’s most celebrated chapters. Under his training, the filly Rose de Bahama, owned by H.H. The Maharaja of Idar, achieved a rare Classic treble:

• 🐎 Indian 2000 Guineas (Gr.1)

• 🐎 Indian Oaks (Gr.1)

• 🐎 Indian Derby (Gr.1)

This sweep of the major three-year-old Classics — especially for a filly competing against colts — was unprecedented and stood unmatched for decades in Indian turf history.

In the 1960 Indian Derby, Rose de Bahama won decisively, giving Narayan Singh one of the most memorable victories of his career.

Her Classic achievements confirmed Narayan Singh’s training mastery — a trainer who not only understood how to prepare fillies and colts tactically but could condition them to peak when it mattered most.

---

Beyond the Classics — Later 1960s

Following these triumphs, Rose de Bahama continued to run with distinction, winning prestigious races like the Willingdon Cup at Poona and the Brabourne Cup at Bombay, further enhancing the reputation of her trainer.

Narayan Singh’s early years at Idar set a pattern of excellence — combining judicious handling, careful race selection, and long-term conditioning that brought out the best in his horses.

---

Transition and Contribution — Pratap Stud & Bangalore (1970s–1980s)

When the Idar stable reduced its racing interests, Narayan Singh played a key role in helping establish Pratap Stud, bringing his training and horsemanship insights into breeding and long-term bloodstock development.

He later moved to Bangalore, where he trained for Sardar Darshan Singh Ghumman, producing Classic winners such as:

• Sarb-Kla

• Ekta

• Anekta

His time in Bangalore demonstrated his versatility — able to adapt to a different racing centre and continue producing high-class performers.

---

Final Chapters — Calcutta (1990s)

In the early 1990s, Narayan Singh moved to Calcutta, bringing decades of experience to the eastern circuit. Even in his later years, he remained engaged with racing, mentoring younger trainers and applying his deep practical knowledge to condition horses for competitive performance.

---

TRAINING PHILOSOPHY

Narayan Singh stood out for his deep horsemanship:

• Every horse is an individual — trained according to its physical and mental makeup

• Patience over pace — ensuring soundness before speed

• Reading the racehorse from the saddle to the paddock — a perspective few trainers bring with such intimacy

These principles helped him succeed across multiple decades and racing hubs.

---

LEGACY

Narayan Singh’s legacy transcends wins and stakes. He remains remembered as:

• A trainer of Classic dominance, especially through Rose de Bahama’s remarkable sweep of Indian Classics.

• A horseman’s horseman — respected for integrity, patience, and intuitive conditioning

• A mentor whose influence lived on through those he trained, taught, and inspired

His son, Mahindar Singh Rathore, later became one of India’s leading racing analysts and voices, further ensuring that Narayan Singh’s contribution to the sport remains part of the living memory of Indian horse racing.

WHEN PERSONAL CONDUCT BRINGS THE SPORT INTO DISREPUTE

 WHEN PERSONAL CONDUCT BRINGS THE SPORT INTO DISREPUTE

Reports emerging from Kolkata’s racing circuit regarding an alleged altercation involving a licensed trainer have sent shockwaves through the fraternity. If even a fraction of what is being discussed in racing corridors is true, the episode represents a deeply disturbing breach of professional ethics and a serious embarrassment to Indian horse racing.

Horse racing is not merely a sport; it is an industry built on trust, integrity and public confidence. Trainers are custodians of owners’ investments, role models for young professionals, and representatives of the turf in the public eye. Any allegation of financial exploitation, misuse of borrowed funds for betting, or personal betrayal, if proven, strikes at the very foundation of that trust.

Even more alarming is the suggestion that a private dispute spilled into a public racing environment, allegedly culminating in a confrontation at the stables. Racing premises are places of discipline and decorum—not theatres for personal drama. Such scenes, if allowed to occur unchecked, reduce the sport to ridicule and hand ammunition to its critics.

The racing industry already battles issues of credibility, transparency, and public perception. It cannot afford licensed professionals whose alleged off-track behaviour mirrors recklessness, moral irresponsibility, or financial indiscipline. Whether on or off the track, those privileged to hold licences are expected to uphold minimum standards of character and restraint.

Equally important is the role of authorities and regulators. Silence or inaction in the face of such episodes—real or alleged—only fuels cynicism. If complaints exist, they must be examined dispassionately. If misconduct is established, accountability must follow, irrespective of status or connections.

Horse racing in India does not suffer from lack of talent; it suffers from tolerance of behaviour that would be unacceptable in any other professional sport. The time has come to draw a firm line: personal conduct that disgraces the turf has no place in the saddle, the stable, or the weighing room.

The sport deserves better.

The public deserves better.

And the many honest professionals within racing deserve not to be tarnished by the alleged failings of a few.

PLAYERS AS REFEREES: HOW OWNER-STEWARDS ARE POISONING INDIAN HORSE RACING

OWNERS IN THE STEWARDS’ BOX: THE ORIGINAL SIN OF INDIAN HORSE RACING

Horse racing does not get corrupted gradually. It gets corrupted instantly—the very moment a racehorse owner is allowed to sit as a Stand Member, Club Member, or worse, a Sitting Steward.

This is not a grey area. This is not a “perception problem.” This is a structural conflict of interest, and it strikes at the heart of sporting integrity.

You cannot be player and referee in the same arena. Yet Indian horse racing continues to pretend that this basic principle of governance does not apply to it.

---

THE FATAL CONFLICT

A racehorse owner’s interests are simple and absolute:

• Their horses

• Their trainers

• Their jockeys

• Their betting positions

• Their long-term stable economics

A steward’s duty is equally absolute:

• Impartial enforcement of the Rules of Racing

• Fearless interrogation of suspicious rides

• Protection of the betting public

• Preservation of the sport’s credibility

These two roles are mutually exclusive.

The moment an owner occupies a steward’s chair, every enquiry becomes compromised:

• Is the jockey being questioned because the ride was bad — or because it hurt a rival?

• Is an enquiry dropped because it might implicate a friendly trainer?

• Is a “benefit of doubt” granted because tomorrow it could be their horse in the dock?

Even if the steward-owner acts honestly, the damage is already done. Justice must not only be done — it must be seen to be done. And in this setup, it never is.

---

SILENCE, SELECTIVITY, AND CONVENIENT BLINDNESS

Ask any seasoned punter, professional jockey, or backstretch worker and they will tell you the same story:

• Certain stables enjoy remarkable immunity

• Certain trainers are “never available” for questioning

• Certain jockeys repeatedly escape meaningful scrutiny

• Certain favourites fail so spectacularly that explanation becomes impossible

Yet enquiries are either cosmetic or non-existent.

Why?

Because no steward wants to pull a thread that might unravel their own network.

Indian racing has perfected the art of selective outrage:

• Minor offenders punished swiftly

• Outsiders made examples of

• Insiders protected by procedural fog

This is not incompetence.

This is design.

---

THE PUNTER PAYS THE PRICE

Horse racing survives on one fragile pillar: public trust.

When punters believe:

• Results are manipulated

• Rides are choreographed

• Enquiries are theatre

• Stewards are conflicted

They walk away.

And they are walking away.

Empty stands, shrinking pools, collapsing credibility — all while administrators scratch their heads and blame “market conditions” or “changing entertainment habits.”

No.

The reason is simpler and more brutal:

People do not bet on a rigged courtroom.

---

GLOBAL NORMS, LOCAL FARCE

In serious racing jurisdictions worldwide:

• Stewards are independent professionals

• Owners are barred from governance roles

• Cooling-off periods are mandatory

• Conflicts are disclosed and enforced

In India?

Owners sit in judgment over a sport in which they have millions at stake.

This is not tradition.

This is institutionalised conflict.

---

THE ONLY WAY FORWARD

If Indian horse racing wants even a chance at redemption, the reforms must be uncompromising:

1. Absolute ban on racehorse owners being Stand Members, Club Members, or Sitting Stewards

2. Independent, professionally trained stewards with fixed tenure

3. Full public disclosure of conflicts of interest

4. Transparent, reasoned enquiry reports made public

5. Accountability for stewards — not immunity

Anything less is cosmetic surgery on a terminal disease.

---

FINAL WORD

Horse racing does not die because of bad horses, bad jockeys, or even bad administration.

It dies when governance is captured by self-interest.

As long as owners sit in the stewards’ box, Indian horse racing will remain what it tragically is today:

A sport where outcomes are questioned, integrity is doubted, and the honest punter is the only guaranteed loser.

This is not reform versus status quo anymore.

This is integrity versus extinction.

A.SANDESH & THE BEZALEL FARCE — A CASE THAT DEMANDS EXEMPLARY JUSTICE

A.SANDESH & THE BEZALEL FARCE — A CASE THAT DEMANDS EXEMPLARY JUSTICE

What unfolded in the final race at Mahalaxmi on 21st December 2025 was not merely a defeat of an odds-on favourite — it was a public mockery of racing integrity played out in full view of thousands.

Jockey A. Sandesh, astride BEZALEL, rode in a manner that can only be described as bewildering, defensive, and inexplicably passive. At a time when urgency was demanded, the so-called champion rider appeared ALL AT SEA — producing just three perfunctory whips out of the eight permitted, never once asking the horse a serious question when the race was still within reach.

To the naked eye — and to any honest racing professional — BEZALEL was openly hooked. There was no vigour, no conviction, no attempt to win commensurate with the weight of public money invested. Even a toddler could sense something was amiss.

An Enquiry has been opened, but let it be said plainly:

This is not a borderline case.

This is not a “judgement error”.

This is not a matter to be buried under routine explanations.

This was DAYLIGHT ROBBERY of punter faith.

The RWITC once prided itself on being uncompromising — errant jockeys were sent on a leather hunt, not offered soft landings. That legacy is now on trial.

If this case is allowed to pass with a slap on the wrist, then the message is chillingly clear:

👉 On-money favourites may be stopped with impunity

👉 Punter money is expendable

👉 Integrity is negotiable

This enquiry must not merely exist — it must bite.

Anything short of exemplary punishment will confirm what the common punter already fears:

that justice in Indian racing is selective, timid, and afraid of big names.

The sport cannot survive another Bezalel.

The public deserves answers.

And this time — justice must be seen, not just spoken of.

INDIAN HORSE RACING: A SYNDICATE MASQUERADING AS A SPORT

Indian Horse Racing: A Syndicate Masquerading as a Sport 

Indian horse racing has ceased to be a sport. It is now a closed syndicate, run by invisible hands, where the punter is nothing more than prey. The system is so brazen that deception is no longer hidden—it is performed in plain sight.

Every other race day delivers the same farce: odds-on favourites imploding, form books rendered useless, and “explanations” so insulting that they assume the betting public to be intellectually vacant. *This is not competition. This is theatre—scripted, rehearsed, and monetised.* 

What makes the rot incurable is the total abdication of authority.

The Stewards, entrusted with safeguarding integrity, have reduced themselves to rubber stamps in blazers. There is no appetite to interrogate, no courage to question repeat patterns, and no urgency to protect the sport. Inquiries are conducted only to create the illusion that something was done; conclusions are pre-decided; files are closed, and silence restored.

At the centre of this decay stands a powerful trainer in Western India, operating with such impunity that the damage inflicted on racing’s credibility appears deliberate. Results defy logic with numbing regularity, yet scrutiny never follows. In any functioning jurisdiction, such a record would invite relentless investigation. In India, it invites protection.

Inside the administration, the truth is neither hidden nor denied—it is managed.

Half the establishment feeds off the system, directly or indirectly. The other half—spineless, compromised, or intimidated—watches in mute acceptance as the sport bleeds. Governance has been replaced by collusion, regulation by selective blindness, and leadership by convenient amnesia.

The consequences are catastrophic.

Honest professionals are suffocated.

Genuine owners are driven away.

The punter—whose money sustains this ecosystem—is systematically fleeced.

Indian horse racing is not dying because of lack of horses, jockeys, or fans. It is dying because corruption has been normalised and accountability deliberately dismantled.

This is not decline.

This is capture.

And unless the cartel is confronted—by fearless stewards, independent oversight, and public exposure—the sport will continue its march towards irrelevance, remembered not for its champions, but for the confidence with which it cheated its own people.